First Blood

So I’m watching First Blood again, the first Rambo movie. I love it. Great movie. And it got me thinking…

 

It’s by far the best one. I don’t even watch the poor movies that followed using the Rambo name.

 

First Blood is about tyranny at home. A Green Beret soldier, back from Nam, encounters a corrupt local sheriff’s office, and has to defend himself.

 

Near the end, when Rambo is yelling at Colonel Troutman, he mentions Vietnam, where he was trained to “win” but “someone wouldn’t let us win” is what he says.

All of the subsequent Rambo impersonations had storylines (if you could call them that) about taking on hostile foreign governments or terrorists…

 

I saw a lot of truth in First Blood. I have a feeling the original writers did, too. Because they never told that story again.

 

Open Letter to Doubters

I wrote this as a response to an email by a close relative. But it fits as an open letter to all who are doubters of what’s been said so far in this blog site…

Run through all this in your brilliant mind. My efforts in communicating to you what I believe is really happening, not only in our country, but around the world, has led to you admitting that you can’t agree any longer with the official explanation of the so-called plane that hit the Pentagon (I have your email if you try to deny it). So let’s take this through a logical progression: Who, in our government, publicly agrees with the official story that an Arab terrorist hijacked an airliner and slammed it into the wall of the Pentagon? Well, ALL WHITE HOUSE PERSONNEL, FROM THE PRESIDENT DOWN. So what does that say? One of two things…either these people really believe that, in which case their access to the most impressive array of investigative technologies in the world means absolutely nothing and these people are simply idiots…or, they know the truth and they are LYING. If they are lying, then we can form some more conclusions. Any president, or high-ranking official of our supposedly publicly-elected federal government who lies about something of this magnitude has a very definitive agenda. We can also surmise, that if the latter is true, then many people are complicit. The paper trail created by the documents and public statements that must be drafted, viewed, and ultimately signed and accepted by everyone from a white house press secretary to the President requires involvement from a myriad of personnel. That is quite a lot of people across a rather broad spectrum that are just plain ignorant of one of the most important events in the history of our nation. Does that sound plausible to you? It is far more likely that these people are, in fact, part of a larger conspiracy. I even hesitate to use that word. For it implies a temporary alliance to further a specific agenda. That doesn’t seem to be the case here. This is far more advanced and goes far deeper into the minds of those involved. It is more like a belief system. These people believe something so radically immoral that they can defend and rationalize targeting and killing their own citizens.  We know for sure that Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were working closely together under the Ford administration decades ago. This belief system, then, would be so different from what the average American believes, that they would be bound to secrecy for fear that bringing light to their deeds and reasons would lead to their destruction. That’s quite an incentive to lie on public record, over and over.

Now, are these ideas so far-fetched as to be laughable? That high ranking US officials could even think about killing their own citizens in the problem-reaction-solution model to further a specific agenda? If you say yes, then you need to do some more homework. Because that leads us to the Northwoods Document. A document that was never intended to be brought to light. During the Kennedy administration, when we had the Cuban Missile Crisis, this document was drafted whereby top white house and military officials surmised that an attack on US citizens, by our own military and then blamed on the Cubans, could lead to the preferred solution of invasion. This document even went so far as to say that the Army could take soldiers and dress them up as Cubans and have them attack the Marines at Guantanamo Bay! Of course, if that plan had been implemented, there would’ve been plenty of press coverage and photos of these “Cuban” soldiers ruthlessly attacking our poor boys in uniform to outrage the American public. Why didn’t it happen? Because Kennedy came to his senses and rebelled against his Illuminati handlers. He signed a presidential directive to dissolve the Federal Reserve and voiced his plans to abolish the CIA. He was assassinated soon after.

Now, we know it’s not beyond those who believe in occult systems to lie about their true allegiances. They are perfectly willing to claim they are Christian, or Muslim, or whatever would seem to benefit them the most in any given situation. These kind of people cannot be trusted, ever. As a matter of fact, the only thing we can trust about them is that their plans and schemes will become more and more extreme, as each completed mission brings them that much closer to their ultimate goal, their endgame. Which is a one-world government of total control over a massively reduced population, combined with a universal, seemingly all-inclusive one-world religion, and enforced by a world military entity that has all the weapons against a largely unarmed, tightly controlled global citizenry.

And we have proof of the occult practices of these alleged traitors. George Bush, George HW Bush, and Bill Clinton were all verified guests at a place called the Bohemian Grove. An investigative reporter managed to infiltrate the compound in rural California several years ago and brought to light some of what takes place there. It involves mock sacrifice, burning effigies, and worshipping of a 40ft tall statue of a pagan god. It was all caught on video tape!

Now, what can we deduce from the Bohemian Grove? Well, for one, we can be pretty sure that when George Bush claims he is a devout Christian, he is lying. It’s really that simple. Not only that, but he has no crisis of conscience about attending a pagan occult ceremony. Now these occults are heavily into homosexuality, as well. We also know Bush has had a homosexual porn star visit the White House numerous times (never heard that one on CNN, did ya? Huh…go figure), and Bush has been observed holding hands with other men and kissing them tenderly on their heads, an action that goes back to medieval times and suggests he has lordship over them. This also belies a psychology of domination, which can also include extreme cruelty, and emotional dysfunction.

If all this is true, then how did it happen? Simple. We let it happen. Oh, maybe not you and I personally, but the ultimate responsibility for the actions of our leaders rests with We The People. Most Americans today are so programmed that they will simply stay in their own mental bubbles, rather than roll up their sleeves and dig into what’s really going on. And the media simply saturates us with propaganda designed to keep us in intellectual slumber from so many different sources that when the word “conspiracy” is mentioned, our first response is to just deny it is possible. However, when you follow the trail up the ladder of the media corporations, they all lead to the same group of people, who are affiliated with the same government officials, over and over again. So the little independent news source that we thought we could trust is actually owned by a media outlet with a slightly higher profile, which is in turn under the umbrella of even bigger corporations etc. Next thing we know we are staring at the CEO of Fox or some other major network.

So trivialize all you wish, but even you have admitted, through my earnest attempts at reaching you, that things are not what they seem in our government. Today you know that. Imagine what you’ll know, tomorrow…

Just a Thought on “We the People”

(I wrote this about 18 months ago. It’s interesting to see that I already saw major problems with the government and how we aide them back then, without knowing what I know now…)

I heard that Nancy Pelosi is presently attempting to appoint a Florida judge that was impeached for corruption as head of the House Intelligence Committee. It is a dark day for us when we see elected leaders acting like corrupt mafia dons.

Conservatives are saying things like: “Calm down, it’s not the end” and “This was not as bad as everyone thought, conservatism actually won this election” as they compare it to historical statistics on sixth-year elections and look at the “conservative” Democrats that won. OK. Let’s stay in the left-right (it’s all about conservatives/republicans vs. liberals/democrats) prison that was designed so well for us.

Call it what you will. I see no reason for anything but righteous indignation. For if this election somehow is indeed indicative of the death-throes of the current Democratic Party that will hardly console my conscience as we are left naked by morally bankrupt “useful idiots” that we voted into power. 

The bottom line is this: I cannot comfort myself into a cozy, secure, optimistic slumber as I lay in bed at night knowing that the current leadership is already hard at work undermining our national sovereignty and security. That more innocent people are going to die in the sad tradition of 9/11 is no laughing matter, and I will not treat it as such. 

I believe that the problem is more about values, or rather the lack thereof. People don’t understand that, as they embrace liberalism, self-exaltation, and the denial of universal truths, they BECOME the problem and are the catalyst for the things that are happening. They are so blind that in an effort to “make the world a better place” they are electing people who are as confused, self-absorbed, petulantly immature, morally bankrupt, and power hungry as they have grown up to be in this age of the anti-family. They end up voting for the destruction of the freedoms they claim to hold so dear.

The Greatest Thief in the History of the World

We’ve all noticed the rising gas prices. Even when told by the media that they are going “down”, what is really happening is that we took 2 steps back after taking 3 steps forward and the net increase in price is 1 step.

Most of us try to be good citizens and pay income taxes, as well. However, when you know the facts about the history of the 16th Amendment to the constitution, you may not be so inclined in the future.

This is a very good article by Joseph Farah, of WorldNetDaily.com:

“Who’s to blame for gas prices?

Who is most to blame for America’s skyrocketing gasoline prices?

The list of suspects and collaborators is long – foreign oil producers, environmentalists, lack of competition among oil companies, instability in the Middle East, etc.

Yet, none of those can begin to compete with the U.S. federal government as the chief contributor to $4-plus-a-gallon gas and $130-a-barrel oil. And the problem is far bigger than you might suspect.

It’s not just at ANWR in the remote parts of Alaska where Washington continues to is prohibit pumping of vast reserves of oil – even in a time of national crisis, when the American people are on the verge of apoplexy over gas prices. In fact, the U.S. government is pretty much blocking exploration and pumping of oil on most so-called public land.

Federal lands throughout the United States are estimated to contain 31 billion barrels of oil and 231 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Some 60 percent of onshore federal lands that have potential as domestic sources of oil and natural gas are officially closed to leasing by the Bureau of Land Management. That translates to 62 percent domestic oil reserves inaccessible for development.

But it gets worse.

An additional 30 percent of onshore federal oil and 49 percent of onshore federal gas may only be developed subject to restrictions over and above standard environmental lease terms, including seasonal timing limitations.

And, I am afraid, it gets still worse.

Just 8 percent of onshore federal oil and 10 percent of onshore federal gas are accessible under standard lease terms.

That’s quite a service the federal government is providing for the country, isn’t it? But if you don’t like the fact that Washington is blocking development of oil and gasoline on lands owned by you, consider this.

Not only is the federal government’s energy policy bent toward subverting the development of energy, Washington also demands – and gets – a huge cut on the sale of every gallon of gasoline sold, far more, in fact, than the oil companies themselves profit from each gallon.

It’s true.

While few Americans realize they own the land where drilling could bring gas prices down dramatically, they also have little clue that up to 75 cents of the cost per gallon is the result of local, state and federal taxes– and that number is rising. That’s because government profits to the tune of 20 percent of the cost paid at the pump.

Do you think government has an incentive to lower the cost of a gallon of gas when it rakes in 20 percent of the price? I don’t think so. Government is, in fact, making windfall profits from rising gas prices. By definition, the oil companies do not make windfall profits. As any economics101 student knows, windfall profits are those made without effort or investment. The only party making windfall profits from gas and oil by that definition is government. Government has every possible incentive to keep gas prices high and going higher.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, when the average price of regular unleaded gas peaked at $3 per gallon in 2006, most major companies were profiting only about 10 cents per gallon on refining and marketing options, while the federal government alone profited by as much as 18.4 cents per gallon.

And what did the government do to earn that money? It blocked exploration and development of oil. What a racket! How do I invest in those futures?

Well, you can’t exactly invest in the government. It’s more like allowing yourself to be extorted at the point of a gun.”

Wow. The federal governemnt gets up to 20% of all revenue generated by the sale of gasoline in this country, through taxation. Presumably, they make more than the oil companies themselves!

One must wonder, then, when you consider the fact that oil companies have been posting record profits each quarter, which are in the billions, then what, exactly, is happening to the hundreds of billions of dollars at least that is going to Uncle Sam every 4 months? Anyone? Where is it?

Seems to me that the economic stability of our nation is under great duress at this point, yet I turn on the talking heads (see previous blog) and it’s spun that things are just hunky-dorey, with a little “hiccup” in the economy, nothing to be worried about just keep using gas and paying taxes, thanks very much. Not a word of the plummeting housing industry, which in turn affects several other closely-related industries.

Has anyone tried to get a job lately, in anything other than financial, security or government work? Seems everyone I know is talking of layoffs and small to medium businesses going under.

Why are we not talking about how the U.S. dollar is doing? Why aren’t we talking about how, once the most trusted and used reserve currency in the world is now being shunned at every turn by foreign investors?

Now let me get this straight, you might say…The goverment has a debt now that equals the sum total of debt under all previous adminstrations, Congress talks about money to do this and that all the time when they are interviewed, yet trillions of dollars of tax revenue alone from gas and oil taxation are supposedly…where, exactly?

That’s only one source of revenue for this massively bloated beast we’ve inherited. Let’s look at another interesting article.

16th AMENDMENT WAS DECLARED “IN EFFECT” NOT RATIFIED

The Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was never ratified by a majority of the sovereign States.

This is the Amendment that allegedly entitled the Federal Agent (government) in the federal territory of Washington, D.C. and their private collection company, the IRS, to collect “income tax” was falsely declared to be ratified in February 1913 by Secretary of State Philander Knox.

After an exhaustive year long search of legislative records in 48 sovereign states (Alaska & Hawaii were not admitted into the Union until after 1913), Bill Benson wrote his fact findings in The Law That Never Was, Vols. 1 & 2. He was able to unequivocally prove that the 16th Amendment was never Constitutionally, properly, or legally ratified. The only record of the 16th Amendment having been confirmed was a proclamation made by the Secretary of State Philander Knox on February 25, 1913, wherein he simply declared it to be “in effect“, but never stating it was lawfully ratified.

Even if the 16th Amendment were properly ratified, according to Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, it has always been unconstitutional for the U.S. Federal Government to directly tax We the People in their property, wages, salaries, or earnings. The judges of the U.S. Supreme Court rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, when they ruled that it “created no new power of taxation” and that it “did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals”.

If you follow the link, you will see the table of records of how each state voted on this Amendment, and it never received full and propler acceptance from the majority of states needed to legally ratify this amendment.

Also, look at the wording of this Amendment.

16th Amendment:

Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratifi ed February 3, 1913. (Note: Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution was modifi ed by the 16th Amendment.)….….

.. ……

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.“

 ….

Interesting to see why so many of the states balked at this amendment. Look at how it is worded. Congress shall have the power to collect taxes on income from any source. That, in and of itself, is far too broad and sweeping a power to give any federal entity. It goes against everything the framers stood for and wrote about. Not only that, but it says that this power shall be “without regard to any census or enumeration”.

Wow. So many people will read that and not see anything wrong with it. So this power of Congress to tax any source of income is beyond the majority will of the people (census, root word of consensus) and is beyond the ability to enumerate, or break down this power and discuss it line by line. How open and honest is that? Are you kidding me?

Can anyone even imagine how much total revenue has been generated from the government receiving up to 30% of our earnings from any source it chooses for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of people over the last 95 years?

This is truly the biggest theft over the longest time for the largest amount ever, that I know of. The federal governmet would have you believe this money is going to fight white Al-Qaeda in our country. OK. And that’s why our southern borders are wide open and there are a record number of kindappings in border towns all over the southwest, yet some TSA agent at the airport who can barely spell “constitution” is telling me that my toothpaste tube presents such a great danger to the safety of the crew and my fellow passengers that I must put it in a Ziploc bag and seal it in order to remove said danger. When did we move into the Twilight Zone?

Where is all the money? Can we really assume there’s no entity that has influence over Washington, D.C.? Can we really dismiss, in the face of increasingly conclusive evidence, the fact that our own government does not, indeed, belong to us and hasn’t for quite some time?

The federal government is not our mommy. Its not our Big Brother, looking out for our welfare. It was designed to be a very limited republic, with limited powers. It’s not for welfare or medicaid. Its not to teach our children how to be mindless mushballs that are stupid, obese, and in a state of pharmaceutically-induced compliance. It’s not for telling us we can’t speak out about what’s going on in this country unless a cop tells us we can in a designated “free speech zone”.

Unfortunately, the only thing needed for this abomination to continue is the ever-reliable intellectual slumber of We The People. There was a reason those are the first three words of the most profound document in our history.

Men and women of honor cannot sit idly by while the biggest atrocities in the history of mankind take shape around us. We must be compelled by God Himself to act in defense of those upon whom the wolves wish to prey. If not for the simple fact that this hunting ground includes our own families and friends.

So my question is this: When are we going to decide to act? When do we shake off this almost surreal stupor we are in and wake up to what’s really happening?

True courage isn’t the absence of fear. It’s doing the right thing in spite of it.

WAKE UP.

 

The Barabbas Complex

 

 

This is a very revealing passage in the Bible which gives us insight into man’s ignorance…

 

 

(Yeshua, His real name, inserted by me)

Mat 27:11-25 And Jesus [Yeshua] stood before the governor: and the governor asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus [Yeshua] said unto him, Thou sayest. (12) And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing. (13) Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee? (14) And he answered him to never a word; insomuch that the governor marveled greatly. (15) Now at that feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would. (16) And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas. (17) Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus [Yeshua] which is called Christ? 18. For he knew that for envy they had delivered him. (19) When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him. (20) But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus [Yeshua]. (21) The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas. (22) Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified. (23) And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified. (24) When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. (25) Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

This is a rather fascinating passage of Scripture that sheds some light on a couple of fundamental principles of the human psyche and the ability to manipulate it.

Here we have Yeshua, the Messiah. The one foretold in the Law and the Prophets, of which the ruling class who were hell-bent on murdering him were supposed to be experts. Yeshua was teaching that the laws, or takanots (man-made laws and traditions, NOT the Torah that YHVH gave Moses…Christ never teaches that God’s law is null and void) of the Pharisees and Sadducees were an abomination to God, and grievous to follow. Now, we know that Matthew was actually originally written in Hebrew, not Greek. Therefore, a passage in which Yeshua battles the Pharisees religious system becomes a little clearer, when correctly translated…

Mat 23:2-4 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever [HE(MOSES)] bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their [TAKANOTS, RULES]: for they say, and do not. (4) For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

Here, we have a ruling class, which according to Yeshua Himself, bind heavy burdens that are painful to be borne, yet they themselves do not even follow these laws.

These things were designed for one purpose: Control. If I can devise a religious system which gets you to jump through my flaming hoop, then I have control over your life. I can then bleed you dry, and kill you. This is the system that was in place during Yeshua’s ministry.

In every time of tyranny in history, people have been controlled, manipulated, sucked dry, and murdered. And even at this time, it was nothing new. Several ancient civilizations had already exhibited these traits prior to Jerusalem in Yeshua’s time.

Now, a rational person who still somehow maintains even just a shred of the ability to question, reason, and think independently, would come to the conclusion that this system of control is morally reprehensible, and should be fought at all cost.

But what happened, when the people were given a choice?

Here is Barabbas, a known career criminal. And Yeshua, God’s offer of reconciliation and renewal of His covenant with His people. The Truth. Declared by the Roman magistrate to have been found a just man.

Not only did they deny the Truth, but they chose to have it removed from them so it could no longer inconvenience their seared consciences.

Mat 27:16-20 And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas. (17) Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ? (18) For he knew that for envy they had delivered him. (19) When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him. (20) But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus.

The ruling class, or government in control of the people had such a hold on them that they actually were successful in persuading the masses to choose to remain blind sheep. Amazingly, they were so thoroughly successful that these people actually chose to unleash a known predator on themselves, rather than admit they were slaves! Wow.

So, here is the ruling class, controlling the people, extorting and lying to them. And then the people are given a choice. And this same government told the people to choose to release a thief which could potentially prey on them, over the Truth.

And we know the outcome of this amazing example of the power of propaganda. The people chose their own destruction over the Truth.

Thinking about “pleasant” things to the point where you deny reality isn’t called optimism…its blindness. It’s a sad fact that Americans today would rather be unaware of the Truth. This denial is so deeply ingrained in our hearts that, when given a choice between the Truth and self-destruction, we choose the latter.

This is man without God. This is why the secularization of our society was so aggressively pursued by those in control; because blindness and ignorance are the most infectious, and deadly diseases in the history of mankind.

How else can we explain the Western Gentile Christian’s enthusiastic embrace of outright abominable pagan religious holy days as his own? How else do we explain the apathy of the American public to the atrocities that are being committed against themselves by our own government?

We cried for a choice, we were given one, and we chose Barabbas. Not only did we choose, but we even declared that the blood of the Truth be on our own children.

WAKE UP.

 

 

Adenddum

Did you ever ask yourself, why the Supreme Court needed 157 pages just to say what the Constitution already states in a fraction of the words? The Word of God has much to say of those who use too many words to beguile.

 

Why do we now need the judicial branch of the United States government to validate the rights guaranteed to us by the Constitution? Are these not indisputable rights that are supposed to be above any government seeking to impose control over them? For if we open them up to judicial interpretation, we have not only lost our rights to the opaque prison of privilege, but we have yielded the power of the people over to an unelected few.

 

 

Are you still caught in the Matrix-like web of the left/right paradigm in this country? The distraction through which we wield our considerable God-given intellects in absolute futility (and according to design)?

 

My God, as of 5 months ago, I was a card-carrying conservative! I voted Republican. I had only begun to realize that Bush and the Federal Government were not what they seemed to be. But, the level of truth I thought I knew then versus where I am now is like comparing the first day in Kindergarten to graduating Valedictorian from a university.

 

Please do not misunderstand. To these facts, I do not boast. I mourn. For their conclusion lays a mighty burden to bear on a conscience not too seared to ignore Duty and Honor.

 

WAKE UP, AMERICA!

The Heller Decision

The Heller Decision

 

 

The recent Supreme Court opinion on the DC gun ban cannot possibly be skewed as a victory for gun rights advocates.

 

 

 

First of all, the syllabus is 157 pages long. That itself is historic. Kind of makes you wonder, why do they need all that space just to tell us that they have decided we may keep our right to bear arms? In addition, several large 2nd amendment foundations are heralding this as a new Golden Age of personal safety.

 

 

 

I’ve learned a long time ago, if you can’t present a basic premise clearly, such as the Constitution does in the 2nd Amendment, then you probably are going to have to tell half-truths and outright lies in order to make it sound good.

 

 

 

Pro 26:24-27 He that hateth dissembleth with his lips, and layeth up deceit within him; (25) When he speaketh fair, believe him not: for there are seven abominations in his heart. (26) Whose hatred is covered by deceit, his wickedness shall be showed before the whole congregation. (27) Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.

Well they did a rather thorough job dissembling the 2nd Amendment with the Heller Decision. What’s actually happened is this decision has stripped away what little constitutional protection the right to bear arms had left, and opened it wide to interpretive, activist judges in the Federal Circuits.

It’s kind of like a bully, who wants to steal my toy, but there are adults around, and I might get noticed if I raise my voice. So he quietly comes over to me, puts his hand on my shoulder, looks me directly in the eye and says:

“You know, you should thank me. I’m not going to be a bully. Why? Because I like you. So, in my generosity, I’m going to allow you to play with your toy at certain times, and in designated areas. Now, please don’t disregard these guidelines that have been set up for your protection. If you transgress, then I will have to take your toy away permanently and send you to be incarcerated. Remember; don’t abuse this privilege that I am so mercifully bestowing upon you”

There never was a doubt that the 2nd Amendment referred to citizens of this country. There was no doubt, when carefully researched, that this provision was introduced in order to stop a corrupt and tyrannical government from taking over and harming its own citizens. Read history, people. The 1 killer of human beings in the history of the world, with no close second, is government.

The founding fathers knew this. Why would they have said the right to bear arms was a privilege that only the government can bestow upon you once it decides that you qualify as a federally-controlled militia?

 

Regulation is the back door to restriction. They now have decided that they can regulate what we do with our firearms. The Court is trying to fool us with the illusion of compromise and misdirection…

 

 

 

“Oh, well we can’t ban your guns, that’s not what this is about. No, we’re simply being wise and just telling you where you can store them and how they are stored, and where it’s illegal, and what paperwork you have to fill out…” What’s lost in translation is the assumption made and enforced by the federal government that it has the power to usurp those rights which are guaranteed by the Constitution to remain with the people themselves, almost at will. The country is eerily silent on this point, save a few courageous voices in the wilderness…

 

 

 

The illusion is being perpetrated that the supreme court case has somehow validated the constitution. This can only be possible if the assumption is made that the Supreme Court’s power supersedes that of our Constitution. I will not concede that effrontery. Neither should any discerning gun-rights organization.

 

 

The highest court in our land has now affirmed licensing schemes. There is a RIGHT TO OWN, you don’t need a license. The power to license is the power to prohibit.

 

The talking heads will be saying that the Supreme Court gave us our right to bear arms in this case. But that couldn’t be farther from the truth. Incrementalism is a very effective way of getting agendas pushed by opposition.

 

Your highly touted President and his “republican” court haven’t made it easier to fight crime. They’ve made it easier to fight gun owners.

 

 

 

All tyrannical governments in the past made sure the citizenry was unarmed prior to taking despotic control…Just remember that.

 

WAKE UP.

Talking Heads

Ok, so all of the sudden, as I am perusing the news channels on the television, I happen upon good ol’ CNN, and Anderson Cooper 360.

The first session is about McCain’s campaign manager saying that another terrorist attack on the United States would actually improve his chances of becoming our next President.

Hmmm…Say, isn’t that similar to what I had recently accused the government of saying? About what they claim was another terrorist attack, back on September 11th, 2001? That it was government record that high-ranking officials penned the not-so-novel idea that we needed terrorist attacks in order to further the agendas of a deceitful few?

Ok, so here come the talking heads. One is for McCain and the Republicans. She says that she spoke to McCain’s campaign in order to give them a chance to clarify the statement and of course they obliged. They supposedly told her that the statement was misspoken and was actually alluding to the narrative of terrorism, which, the McCain campaign claims, is a subject that McCain is strong in and the debate of terrorism would greatly help his chances.

Now here comes the Democrat talking head. He claims that the statement (rightfully so) was meant exactly as it was uttered. However, his argument then becomes that this is a peculiarly Republican issue that can be dealt with swiftly by electing Barak Obama.

Does no one else see the insincere, almost “manufactured”, I’d say, presentation of a rather extraordinary statement made by a high-ranking employee of a presidential nominee? A person who is an EMPLOYEE of the people of the United States? One that supposedly speaks for us? (I of course, having given no permission ever, to any politician to unilaterally speak for me.)

This was supposed to fool us into thinking an intelligent debate, with transparency and earnestness, was being conducted to the highest of intellectual standards. The frowns were often and the looks were hard. But when one simply broke down what they were actually saying, it became quickly apparent that this was nothing more than a slick, “made-for-TV” propaganda piece which lacked even a rudimentary subtlety that could fool anyone who actually listened  to this farce for more than a couple of moments.

Now, here comes talking head issue 2. This one is in reference to the story about those school girls that all made a pact together to get pregnant. I’m sure most people have heard of this by now. Well, the network poses the question that is supposed to be debated, as this:

Had the school been freely distributing contraceptives, would this atrocity have occurred?

Now, on the surface, this one is a little more advanced in it’s presentation of a skewed point of view. One that is, even still, so hard to defense that it must literally be shoved down another person’s throat so fast that they won’t have time to chew on it, thus getting a cursory approval from their seared consciences. But it too, when looked at carefully and thought about critically, loses all credibility as the light of understanding shines it’s undeniable glare.

Sometimes, I wish I could go on those shows, and be allowed to respond. For instance, I’d love to let the heads talk about the pregnant girls and then respond incredibly,

“So your point is that the mere absence of the contraceptives at the school was more than enough of a valid reason to compel these girls to make the conscious decision to get pregnant? ARE YOU SERIOUS? That’s your premise?”

Of course, no one dared have the guts to bring that up. It all centered around simply the yes/no choice of whether the school handing out condoms would prevent kids from deciding to have sex. Yeah. Ok.

I’m so tired of these fools. Problem is, it takes mental discipline that we here in America have lacked and which has atrophied since the days we actually had to study hard to get a good grade, back in junior high or high school. And that makes people uncomfortable.

A lifetime of self-conscious fear and denial has caused most Americans today to choose that the simple desire to be left alone trumps any moral or civic responsibility to learn what’s really going on in our own country.

IT’S TIME TO WAKE UP.

Another good one is how the inflation of oil is because of the oil companies and prospecting. Like at least 70% of the increase in the last decade isn’t the continuing devaluation of the dollar. Like foreign countries aren’t dumping the dollar as their reserve currency faster that ever before.

WAKE UP.

Stop watching Oprah and American Idol and start doing your own research on what is really happening to this world. Ask the Supreme GOD of all YHVH, to give you wisdom and discernment, and the truth shall make you free. I believe, in the name of Yeshua Messiah, that good men cannot simply turn away from what is happening around them. Whether such men perceive that this is part of the endgame and unavoidable should be of no consequence to, nor in the least bit hindering of, the decision to act.

Presenting Another Side of the Argument

I actually post this with some trepidation. Some of those I’ve shared some these issues with, such as family, have responded with ridicule and dissmissal, with no regard for the valid points made. Alot of people would stop right there. I, however, am far too stubborn and will not give up so easily.

However, I believe that a full disclosure and objective analysis by both sides of the argument about what really happened on September 11th, 2001 is desperately needed. The federal government insists anyone who questions their version of what happened is tolerating “outrageous conspiracy theories”. This is a clever ploy. Accept one version or you are labeled as a nut job. Is this the mindset of people who are truly objective, and not afraid to defend their position? You decide…

Keep in mind that these bullet points don’t even begin to scratch the surface of the inconsistencies with the federal government’s claims about 9-11.

The day before the attacks, Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was on television responding to accusations that there had been found accounting discrepancies in his office of over 1 trillion dollars. The point of impact in the Pentagon just happened to house the Department of the Navy and some Army accounting offices where some of these records were supposed to be kept (others were in WTC Bldg 7).

The initial hole (before the outer face of the wall collapsed) was estimated at 16-20ft wide….hardly big enough to accommodate a Boeing 757. There was, according to the government’s own reports no indentifying debris at the site. There are certain parts of Boeing 757’s that are virtually indestructible and would not simply vaporize on impact with a concrete structure.  There is no precedent in history for aircraft debris simply disintegrating upon impact. Each airline disaster in history, whether blown up by a bomb or crashing full speed into the ground and/or water, has left miles of debris.

After the Twin Towers were hit, Dick Cheney was observed BY MULTIPLE WITNESSES as an aide kept calling out distances to him in decreasing increments as the Pentagon “plane” closed in. Finally, the aide asked the VP “do the orders still stand?” and Cheney whipped his head around and angrily replied “Of course they still stand! Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

Except for some debris which fell outward, the twin towers fell inward, on their own footprints, at nearly freefall speeds. This would’ve been a physical impossibility if the “experts” accounts of how the buildings could’ve collapsed due to fire, heat, and the subsequent weight of each floor bearing down on the floors below it were even remotely true.

 

Newton’s laws of physics freefall equation…

 

Time2 = (Distance x 2) / Gravity

 

85.7375=2724 / 32

85.5 = 2736 / 32

 

sq rt of 85.5 = 9.2 seconds

 

According to the 9-11 Commission report, the south tower fell in about 10 seconds; .8 seconds longer than an object traveling at free fall speed would take to reach the ground from the top of either building. Even NIST’s engineering report states that the tops of the towers fell at virtually freefall speed.

Mechanical Engineer Gordon Ross states that in order for the heat to cause the failure, it would be over a much longer period of time and the collapse would be asymmetrical,  not along the path of greatest resistance, which would be straight down.

Dr. Frank Gale, who worked with NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) on their findings, said the temperatures that are known to have been present inside the buildings (verified by NASA thermal imaging satellites) would’ve been physically impossible from burning jet fuel.

First Responders reported seeing molten metal flowing underground at the site. If the fires were simply jet fuel at the upper floors, and the resulting implosion of the buildings a result of that fire, how can you get molten steel dripping underground?

Molten metal exceeding 2000 degrees F was discovered in the rubble at ground zero underneath the twin towers and building 7, even with heavy rains, and a constant stream of fire retardance and water, described as “creating a lake”. These fires would not be extinguished until Dec. 13th, making it the longest burning structural fire in history.

“Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that’s what melted the steel. Indeed it didn’t, the steel did not melt” Quote from Dr. Frank Gayle, metals expert, working with NIST on the investigation.

The temperatures that existed in the debris field were impossible as a result of burning jet fuel.

Molten metal was also observed falling from the towers before they fell.

The concrete and everything except the metal was pulverized in the towers as they fell. These pulverized materials created pyroclastic dust clouds, coating Lower Manhattan in a fine dust. Pyroclastic clouds generally occur during one of two events: Volcanic eruptions, and controlled demolitions.

Steel beams, weighing up to 200,000 lbs were thrown laterally, up to 500 feet. A cross section from the World Trade Center, weighing nearly 300 tons, was embedded in the southeastern corner of the American Express building. This piece would’ve had to travel at least 390 feet, maintaining enough kinetic energy to embed itself in the corner of the building.

“What we should have seen, in the debris pile, would’ve been a pyramidal shape, if it had been a gravity-driven collapse…you would’ve seen roughly a conic or pyramidal shape…what we actually did see was a massive ejection of dust and debris and large chunks of steel tens of meters from the towers. It’s hard to see that from a gravity-driven collapse.”

Multiple witnesses and first responders reported hearing a series of explosions, like demolitions.

How can you have windows blown out of buildings blocks away as the towers fell (NOT as the planes hit), if it was simply due to gravity? Where did the kinetic energy come from to cause these forces?

The collapses released over 500 tons of pulverized asbestos into lower Manhattan, along with lead, barium, mercury, chromium, copper, and several other toxic chemicals.

How about the collapse of WTC Building 7? A building which sustained only minor damage, while other buildings which sustained massive damage and were later demolished due to the destruction of the towers, were still standing? The lead architect of the WTC 7 was interviewed saying that he was told they were going to “pull it”…a demolition term. That building fell at almost free fall speed into a neat little pile.  Building 7, which was not hit by an airplane, is the first modern, steel-reinforced high-rise to collapse because of fire. It just so happens that there were very sensitive government offices in WTC 7 and many documents of pending investigations were lost as a result of WTC 7’s collapse.

During the construction of the WTC, spray on fireproofing, comprised of concrete and asbestos, was placed on the core columns. When asbestos was outlawed in 1971, they ceased this procedure at the 64th floor of the south tower. The Port Authority finally realized that this presented a problem, and demolition was not an option. In 1989, the Port Authority estimated the removal of asbestos in the WTC and LaGuardia Airport would’ve cost up to 1 billion dollars. By 2001 the cost for the WTC buildings alone would’ve met or exceeded 1 billion.

Although it was clear that the air was not safe to breathe, the public was urged to return to Lower Manhattan. Wall St reopened on Sept. 17th, and children were allowed to go back to school. Firefighters, rescue workers, and police were allowed to toil in lethal conditions using paper masks from Home Depot, while government officials walked around in Hazmat suits, yet to this day the government shirks responsibility for health care for the 9-11 workers. The EPA, under direct orders from the White House, told New Yorkers that the air was safe to breath. How is this possible when the Port Authority declared that demolition of the towers was not feasible decades ago because of the asbestos?

 EPA Administrator Kristine Whitman issued an internal memo declaring that all statements to the media go through the National Security Council before they are released. Why?

The White House changed EPA press releases to “add reassuring statements…delete cautionary ones”: Sept 13th, an EPA draft never released to the public says the EPA is “testing terrorized sites for environmental hazards”, the white house changes this to EPA “reassures public about environmental hazards”. Sept 16th EPA draft says “recent samples of dust…on Water Street show higher levels of asbestos.” White house changes this to “New samples confirm…ambient air quality meets OSHA standards…not a cause for public concern.” White house omits entirely the phrase “Air samples raise concerns for cleanup workers and office workers near Water St.” Why the changes? Nikki Tinsley, EPA Inspector General said “We were told that a desire to re-open Wall St. and national security concerns were the reasons for the changes.”

These are just the tip of the iceberg on the inconsistencies with the generally accepted theories on 9-11….

Here’s an interesting look into the FBI’s handling of a suspected terrorist on the morning of 9-11…

August 20-September 11, 2001: FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit Unhelpful with Moussaoui Search Warrant

.. type=text/javascript>sEL(‘1626004942-29600′,’29600′)..>  

The FBI Minneapolis field office wishes to search Zacarias Moussaoui’s belongings, which will later be found to contain enough information to potentially stop 9/11 (see August 16, 2001). To do so it must get the approval of the Radical Fundamentalist Unit (RFU) at FBI headquarters. However, the RFU throws obstacles in the warrant request’s path:
RFU chief Dave Frasca stops the Minneapolis office from pursuing a criminal warrant (see August 21, 2001);
When French authorities say that Moussaoui is connected to the Chechen rebels, RFU agent Mike Maltbie insists that the FBI representative in Paris go through all telephone directories in France to see how many Zacarias Moussaouis live there (see August 22, 2001);
Maltbie stops Minneapolis from informing the Justice Department’s Criminal Division about the case (see August 22, 2001);
When RFU agent Rita Flack, who is working on the Moussaoui case, reads the Phoenix memo suggesting that bin Laden is sending pilots to the US for training, she apparently does not tell her colleagues about it, even though it was addressed to several of them, including Frasca (see July 10, 2001 and August 22, 2001);
The RFU does not provide the relevant documentation to attorneys consulted about the request. In particular, Flack does not tell them about the Phoenix Memo, even though one of the attorneys will later say she asked Flack if anyone is sending radical Islamists to the US to learn to fly (see August 22-28, 2001);
When Minneapolis learns Moussaoui apparently wants to go on jihad, Frasca is not concerned and says jihad does not necessarily mean holy war. However, a top Department of Justice attorney will later say “he would have tied bells and whistles” to this comment in a request for a search warrant had he known this (see August 17, 2001 and August 29, 2001);
Maltbie tells the Minneapolis office that getting a warrant will “take a few months” (see August 24, 2001). He also tells Minneapolis, “We know what’s going on. You will not question us.” (see August 27, 2001);
Maltbie weakens the warrant request by editing it and removing a statement by a CIA officer that Chechen rebel leader Ibn Khattab was closely connected to Osama bin Laden, despite their being intelligence linking that leader to bin Laden (see August 28, 2001);
In a key meeting with an attorney about the request, Maltbie and Flack, who are submitting the warrant, are adamant that it is not sufficiently supported (see August 28, 2001);
Frasca opposes a plan to put an undercover officer in the jail cell with Moussaoui to find out more information about his connections to Islamic militants (August 29, 2001 and Shortly After);
The RFU does not want a Minneapolis agent to accompany Moussaoui when he is deported (see (August 30-September 10, 2001));
The RFU does not re-consider getting a criminal search warrant after a decision is taken not to seek a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (see After August 28, 2001);
Frasca and Maltbie are said to oppose a search warrant after 9/11 (see September 11, 2001).
It is unclear why the RFU opposes the warrant so strongly. The Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General will later criticize the RFU staff, but will conclude that they did not intentionally sabotage the warrant application. [US Department of Justice, 11/2004, pp. 101-222 ] A 2004 book by independent researcher Mike Ruppert will speculate that Frasca is actually a CIA agent. Ruppert suggests that the CIA placed Frasca in the FBI to prevent CIA operations from being compromised by FBI investigations. But he does not provide any direct evidence of ties between Frasca and the CIA (see October 1, 2004). The Minneapolis agents will offer a different interpretation of RFU actions. Coleen Rowley will say, “I feel that certain facts… have, up to now, been omitted, downplayed, glossed over and/or mischaracterized in an effort to avoid or minimize personal and/or institutional embarrassment on the part of the FBI and/or perhaps even for improper political reasons.” She asks, “Why would an FBI agent deliberately sabotage a case? The superiors acted so strangely that some agents in the Minneapolis office openly joked that these higher-ups ‘had to be spies or moles… working for Osama bin Laden.’… Our best real guess, however, is that, in most cases avoidance of all ‘unnecessary’ actions/decisions by FBI [headquarters] managers… has, in recent years, been seen as the safest FBI career course. Numerous high-ranking FBI officials who have made decisions or have taken actions which, in hindsight, turned out to be mistaken or just turned out badly… have seen their careers plummet and end. This has in turn resulted in a climate of fear which has chilled aggressive FBI law enforcement action/decisions.” [Time, 5/21/2002] Minneapolis FBI agent Harry Samit will agree with explanation, telling the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General that the RFU is guilty of “obstructionism, criminal negligence, and careerism.” [Associated Press, 3/20/2006]

 

 

 

Just think about it…is the possibility that our own government has perpetrated “false flag” terrorist operations on its own people really that fantastic? Just look at the Northwood Documents…an astounding insight into how the top officials in the US really think. This is a well-documented government source that is not disputed. Just Google it. In it, the top military officials in the White House are talking about how to use terrorism attacks on the US to further their agendas. They say it right in plain English! And what about our own Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, caught on tape actually saying that we needed another big terrorist attack to galvanize the public to support furthering their agendas? IT’S ON TAPE, NOT AN OPINION OF SOME NUT JOB!

This isn’t without historical precedent. When the Christians were gaining popularity in the Roman Empire, Nero had the city burned and blamed it on them. The public then was all too willing to throw them to the lions.

When Napolean lost the battle against the British/Prussian pincer attack, Nathan Rothchild had an agent at the battle, and he received news of Napolean’s defeat a full 20 hours before the news reached England. He leaked that Napolean had won, and the stocks at London bottomed out. He bought up almost the entire British economy, at pennies on the pound.

Hitler burned down the parliament buidling and blamed it on his enemies, thus increasing public support for his regime.

But why don’t the American people know? Because they are programmed. Think about that, too. The government knows they can’t survive a total uprising of the American people, like in the Revolutionary War. They don’t have enough control, yet. There are still too many guns out there. So what do they do? They hire the best and brightest minds, recruiting them out of college, to work for them in the behavioral sciences fields. They know more about how to program a human mind than any single expert psychologist working in the private sector. They know how to manipulate what and how you think, using all forms of media, but especially television. I mean, back in the 70’s they were experimenting on how certain cycles of flickering on a TV set could affect different parts of the brain of someone who is exposed to it. That was 30 years ago! Imagine, with pretty much unlimited funding and no crisis of conscience about experimenting on the public, how much better they are at it now. Follow the money trail of all the major media corporations and they lead to the same people.

So people are sedentary, and compliant. They watch Fox news, pray for George Bush, and think they’re getting the truth. They watch entertainment shows and live their lives absorbed in their own worlds. And older Americans completely immerse themselves in the past. Ever wonder why that holds such a strong impulse? Could it be that deep down they know that something’s very wrong with things today, and they are subconsciously seeking the comfort of what they perceived were better times, even though their views of the government were wrong then, too? They became unwitting victims, as did most people, of the propaganda of WWII support, as well as a lot of them having the hyper-patriotism of an upbringing from very gracious immigrant parents. I was taught the same things, my father being a WWII vet, son of immigrants and I also serving in the Army.

But the truth has a way of deprogramming the mind. Christ Himself said that the truth will set us free. I believe we are still lucid enough to break free. .

Just look at the political “spectrum”. The left-right paradigm is a sham, designed to distract voters into thinking they have viable choices and can make a difference. Look at the sad sack of presidential choices we have. Not one of those people are honorable and have integrity. Yet, Congressman Ron Paul has received more funding in smaller amounts, from individual people than any of the other so-called candidates. Yet, the Republican Party has already crowned McCain as its heir apparent to the White House throne. They are denying Paul delegation representation at the RNC. Why? Because McCain is a globalist who takes his orders from Mount Olympus, just like Bush. He won’t rock the boat. Obama’s no better and Clinton is an outright socialist.

Think about it. Why would the government pass legislation, that gives it almost unchecked power to unilaterally declare anyone who has a problem with them a “terrorist”, thereby, according to the blessed Patriot Act, stripping them of all constitutional rights to a trial by jury and facing their accusers and being given a definitive judgment? According to the Patriot Act, anyone labeled a terrorist can be held indefinitely, with no burden of proof on the government! Why are they building massive FEMA internment camps, all over the US? What, exactly, are they getting ready for?

Why did the government make it standard to put fluoride in drinking water? They knew back in the 30’s that concentrations of anything above 2 parts per million were toxic, yet today levels in municipal drinking water is somewhere around 2 parts per hundred. They have school children taking fluoride solutions weekly in schools, with levels even higher! Fluoride is known to reduce IQ (dumb down the public), cause bone damage and kidney failure. That’s just the tip of a massive iceberg of incredulous indictments against our government in the medical field. Why do drug companies sponsor medical programs in universities and then see their profits rise? Doctors are getting their knowledge of healing people from companies who can only make money off of the sick. I believe a rational person would consider this a conflict of interest (kind of like Dick Cheney’s financial stakes in Halliburton a company that just coincidentally makes money off of wars).  Ever wonder why medical technology is more advanced than ever before, yet more people are sick and dying at earlier ages while pharmaceutical companies post record profits as they dope up the dying on the way to the grave?

Look at the well-documented historical partnership between I.G. Farben, Bayer, Merck & Co, and the Rockefellers. In fact, the president of Merck, George W. Merck, was America’s biological weapons industry director, personally appointed by President Roosevelt and Secretary of War Stinson in the early 1940s.

And in 1945, when Hitler realized he was going to lose the war, he ordered Martin Bormann, the Third Reich’s economic chief, to bury his war chest to assure Germany’s economic recovery after WW II, but also to assure a virtual monopoly over the world’s pharmaceutical and chemical industries and the “rise of the Fourth Reich.” Much of that money went into Merck & Co.

Now this at the exact time that George W. Merck is advising President Roosevelt on America’s biological weapons status, as director of the industry. And follow the history of those Nazis, including Erik Traub, Hitler’s top bioweapons developer– who was brought over by Henry Kissinger and General Bolling in Project Paperclip — and the exportation of 2000 Nazis into the U.S. industrial and intelligence organizations. And Traub went to work for the U.S. Navy biological research lab, which is affiliated with many of the academic institutions in the U.S. that are the premier biological weapons development and testing operations.

You have to begin to see that there is a whole underlying network of extraordinarily wealthy individuals, in fact, who have an ideology for population reduction, and specifically, the Merck Company’s fund as well as the Rockefeller Foundation, two of the premier American population control funding agencies. And when you see that these people are multinational supporters, and you understand that their ideology for population reduction follows the same reasoning that Hitler followed with racial hygiene: to make it American intelligence’s and national security’s primary interest for foreign policy.

This policy was funded by Prescott Bush (George Bush’s father), General William Draper, and the Rockefellers — the first people in the congress in 1968 that came out in favor of population reduction in the third world — and translated into legislation by Henry Kissinger in National Security Memorandum 200, penned in 1971.

So you begin to see that these are the same people with the same agenda and the same money. And now they have far more money because they’ve invested it all those years. And today’s history that is unfolding before our eyes is a repeat.

Look at the Georgia Guidestones. Go ahead. Check it out. This is their Ten Commandments, sitting plain as day right out in the open. This is what they go by. It calls for, among other things, a worldwide population reduction to 500,000,000. These people, with overwhelming power and influence, think that they can kill innocents for the greater good of the world. There’s no line they won’t cross. Is it really that hard to believe?

Why are children in elementary school, being taught by government officials to become tattle tales on adults? Hello, Hitler, anyone? It’s a fact that they are asked things like where does mommy and daddy keep their guns.

Why has the government turned most of it’s prisons over to corporations (one of which was the now defunct Wackenhut)? Why do these corporations have more lobbyists at county, state, and federal levels than any other interests? Why are they passing more and more insanely restrictive laws with illogically long sentences for infractions? My God, a man was arrested last month for throwing a banana peel on the ground! A young man, son of a prominent member of his community in Texas with no criminal record was pulled over for a broken tail light. The police asked to search his car for drugs. As is his right, he said no. They arrested him on the spot. Obviously, he was Al Qaeda right?

I mean, I watched a commercial the other day that talked about worshipping the sun. It was for potato chips! We need to open our eyes. This is really happening.

If we are truly interested in the truth, and consider ourselves logical and objective, then wouldn’t we want to hear both sides of the argument, before making a judgment?

Don’t forget, I used to be very pro-government. I thought those evil Arabs acted independently, attacking my beloved U.S. out of sheer malice and religious intolerance. I studied the engineering reports, on several documentaries, about how the towers fell because of heat and structural failure, due to the burning jet fuel. I believed it all. But I had never really heard the other side of the argument presented in an objective, factual manner. Once I did, I began to see way too many coincidences and discrepancies. The more I looked into it, the more it became clear that our government had something to hide. Recently declassified information from the government itself condemns them! It’s sick. And they don’t even try to hide it! That’s how arrogant these elites are. So when the crackdown comes, they can revel in the fact that they were so slick that they even told us what they were doing and STILL got away with it!

Keep in mind that I do love America. I love the America the founding fathers (yes, the same founding fathers that law enforcement recruits are now being taught were terrorists. It’s on tape too) envisioned. Not a so-called democracy, but a constitutional republic, with limited democracy. I believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. And I believe in every citizen’s responsibility to fight against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC. I BELIEVE IT’S NOT TOO LATE TO SAVE THIS COUNTRY BUT TIME IS RUNNING VERY SHORT.

Why don’t you do a little research on the Bohemian Grove, in rural California? You will find that it’s proven that HW Bush, Clinton and George W. Bush were all on the guest manifests and verified to have attended. It is nothing less than demonic paganism. They do mock human sacrifices (known as the Cremation of Care, the purging of one’s mind of his God-given conscience in order to do Lucifer’s bidding), and they actually have a ritual worship of a man-made 40ft owl creature they call Molech (which you may recall is one of the gods the Israelites began to worship instead of the one, true God).

You will find that these people are overwhelmingly old, white, rich, homosexual pedophiles.

Now, if this be so, then they are capable of anything. They are lying blasphemers who privately show their true allegiances.

It’s also documented fact that Bush has had a homosexual porn star visit the White House repeatedly.

There is a little known doctrine that Luciferian worshippers hold to. They believe in the account of Adam and Eve, in Genesis. But to them, Lucifer is the bringer of light and knowledge, while God, known simply as the adversary Elohim, is the enemy. It is part of their core beliefs to lie and deceive and they have no problem letting the people think they are Christian.

Ask yourself, with biblical prophecy of the end times being fulfilled as never before, how can Yeshua (Jesus), when talking about the end times, say that the deceptions and illusions will be so great as to “if it be possible, deceive the very elect”? This is that time. It’s being set up by the god of this world and his followers.

 Why are Chinese military soldiers setting up checkpoints in American cities, such as San Francisco?

Why did Florida just pass a law whereby those caught speeding 30mph above the limit will have their vehicles confiscated and be sentenced to prison for 5 to 10 years?

We have 2 million police now in this country. They are hiring convicted felons and illegal immigrants. They are getting ready for the crackdown.

Why did the white house push through the Patriot Act, last minute, in the wee hours of the morning, and NO ONE IN CONGRESS READ THE LEGISLATURE BEFORE VOTING? The white house totally revised it right before the Bush administration gave it to Congress, in the patriotic furor of post 9-11 Washington. This is a matter of record. It is not conjecture. One of the original authors of this Constitution-destroying legislation is a Vietnamese communist!

Bush has the power now to suspend all constitutional government in the even of a “national emergency”. The Patriot Act re-defined national emergency loosely and broaden the criterion. FEMA gets all the power in this event.

There is an overwhelming plethora of evidence that the Federal government has been guilty of eugenics in this country over the last 80 years. Their own declassified documents prove it!

Just look at the Rockefellers and the Rothchilds. David Rockefeller is on record in favor of massive population reduction. Prince Charles is on record saying if he was re-incarnated he’d come back as a virus and kill most of the world’s populace. They are so connected to Bush and Cheney only a fool could ignore it.

Is this all just coincidence? We should just live our lives, oblivious? You can. I will not.

Just consider the possibility that this is true. And let the facts speak for themselves. We may find they are painting a far more sinister picture than you imagined…

We had a war on drugs; there are more drugs than before…

We had a war on poverty, there’s more poverty than before…

We had a war on cancer, there’s more cancer than before…
   

Is there a pattern here?

As Christians, do we put our heads in the sand? Hosea 4:6 says that the people were destroyed for ignorance. We have a responsibility to be a force for good but we can only do that effectively if we know the truth.
 
There are several sites where one can get good information. One of the best is www.infowars.com.

Keep in mind that if this is the first time you’ve had any doubts about 9-11, as you encounter those that have been convinced that our government was complicit for some time, they may come across as intense, or even disengenously passionate about it, yet remind yourself how indignant and dedicated would you be, if you believed these things and were trying to get the truth out. We’ve been far too used to slick oraters even-handedly spewing out propaganda so that when a genuine voice is heard we immediately label them as a conspiracy-theorist nutjob.
 
God bless.

Who am I?

Well, that certainly is a loaded question. However, since you’re here to read what I like to write about, and I really don’t like to write about myself, let’s dispense with the pleasantries, shall we?

My name is Mark. I live in the United States. I was born in 1976. I am considered white (although my family is doing research into our tree and it appears I have some Middle Eastern blood a few generations back).

I was a honor role student, back in school, from grades K through 10th. That’s when the mental and emotional dysfunction that was engulfing me began to affect my academic career. My grades began to slide, and despite basically failing my senior year I managed to graduate high school with a 3.3 GPA. I tried one semester of college and finally just dropped out.

I began to get meaningless jobs at gas stations, etc. And I started using cocaine and heroin. This continued until I was 21, when my dad finally had enough and told me to move out or join the military. So I enilsted.

Well, I managed to stay off of the hard stuff for about a year, in the Army. Then I went back to smoking crack. I met a girl and got her pregnant. And my oldest daughter was born on my birthday, in 1999.

Of course, I finally got to the point where I couldn’t pass a drug test and, despite my sergeant’s best efforts, I was discharged.

Well, now I could get back to killing myself slowly with crack! And that I did, with a newfound gusto. I spent a couple of months in county jail, for various misdemeanor offenses, and finally hit the big time when I signed a check that someone else had stolen and asked me to cash for them. In the state I was living, that is considered an act of forgery all on its own and I ended up incarcerated from 2002 through most of 2003.

One would hope I had learned my lesson at that point. But sadly, my stubbornesss was far too legendary to resign itself to such an ignoble defeat. So back to the pipe I went. I met another girl and got her pregnant and had a second daughter.

Now, we come to December 5th, 2004. The last day I ever did cocaine. That is a whole story by itself. It’s an amazing affirmation of the delivering power of YHVH (God). The point is that I remain free from the shackles of cocaine to this day.  Amazingly, despite a lifetime of harmful chemicals killing my brain cells (and not all from illegal drugs) I still managed to score a 138 on an IQ test recently. One can only wonder what I would have scored, had I not taken the path I chose.

I found a successful job in 2005, got laid off in December, due to the economy, and got married a month later. Now I have an amazing wife that I love, and we have a child on the way. I am currently stuck in a dilemma…32 years old, no schooling, a wasted life (up to 4 years ago), $1000 of monthly child support stacking up, and looking for a way to become financially successful and provide for my family.

It’s hard to get hired with a felony record, you know? People talk of rehabilitation but when it comes to walking the walk employers won’t lift a finger to help someone like me.

I used to be a conservative Republican. Now I’m not. If you read my blogs, you may figure out why.

Anyway, that’s me in a nutshell. This is my blog. For better or worse….only time will tell.

 

Shalom,

Truthdetector, 2008